On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Saldyrkine, Mikhail > <mikhail.saldyrk...@gs.com> wrote: > > The " uint64_t test_noasm(uint64_t idx)" has same loop and the function is > > optimized out. > > There is a difference there, objects is limited to 1024. Loading past > the array bounds is undefined.
But that possibility doesn't seem to me a valid reason to keep the asm from being optimized away. If I were the OP, I'd file an enhancement request in the bugzilla. brgds, H-P
