https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82413
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #3) > I'm always willing to take the blame for things I've broken ;-) but... > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > > Confirmed, started with r253345. > > ... that sounds very unlikely. I had a quick look myself, and that would > instead point to r253341 for this regression/ICE. Sorry, I must have some issue in my bisect script. Thanks.
