https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
--- Comment #10 from dbroemmel <dibr-bugzilla at daswigwam dot de> --- (In reply to janus from comment #9) > This seems to be PR 81018 (which translates into "not your fault"). Good :) > I'm happy for now. Backed by your OpenMP quotes, the patch looks pretty > solid to me. Can I add again: I've not checked (and wouldn't quite know how to) if this Fortran/OpenMP syntax would require any GOMP machinery to work that's not there yet. I did write a few simple minded tests for myself if the outcome of a binary is what I would expect and it did seem work. I also assume that as it did work prior to 4.9.x, all the OpenMP parts are there and work as expected and only the syntax check in the parser failed. And I don't take credit for the patch. It's what the OpenMP-forum entry suggested. > Do you feel confident enough to turn your small example into a dejagnu test > case to be committed along with the patch? We'll also need a short ChangeLog > entry for both. I'm afraid not right now. I have no idea how dejagnu works. I can try and devote some more time to it tomorrow, but I can't promise anything.
