https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On August 24, 2017 4:18:45 PM GMT+02:00, "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > > Bug ID: 81968 > Summary: [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld > SEGV > Product: gcc > Version: 8.0 > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: normal > Priority: P3 > Component: lto > Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org > Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org > CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org > Target Milestone: --- > Target: *-*-solaris2.11 > >The Early LTO Debug patches caused a large number of testsuite >regressions on >Solaris when using /bin/ld: > >+UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20101010-4 >cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o-cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o >execute -std=c++0x -flto -g -r -nostdlib >+FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101010-4 >cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o-cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o link, >-std=c++0x -flto -g -r -nostdlib > >They all are like > >FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/cilk-for-2.c -O3 -flto -g (test for >excess >errors) >Excess errors: >collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation >Fault] >compilation terminated. >ld: warning: file /var/tmp//ccOFDEXadebugobjtem: section [1] has >invalid type [ >SHT_NULL ] >ld: warning: file /var/tmp//ccOFDEXadebugobjtem: section [5] contains >both >SHF_EXCLUDE and SHF_ALLOC flags: SHF_EXCLUDE ignored > >The same problem happens when gcc is configured to use gas and ld >instead of >as/ld, sparc and x86, 32 and 64-bit. > >Clearly a SEGV isn't the best error handling, and I'm not yet certain >if the >errors >are benign. OTOH, I don't yet know why the objects are created this >way. They are created that way to make my life easier. They are supposed to be valid ELF objects and they are according to the specs and my interpretation. > > Rainer
