https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804
--- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #15) > What does this program print on rx? 12 6f883f800000 0 0 > > Overall the softfp code is newer and probably better. Converting rx to use > the softfp code is probably a good idea. I don't think I will have time for that in the near future. It might be better to fix fp-bit first and also avoid future surprises when somebody tries to use it.
