https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517
Fredrik Hederstierna <fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fredrik.hederstierna@securi
| |tas-direct.com
--- Comment #19 from Fredrik Hederstierna
<fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com> ---
It is the SRA pass that sets TREE_NO_WARNING in function from "tree-sra.c":
"create_access_replacement (struct access *access)".
Since acccess-base is set to ARTIFICIAL and IGNORED, the else-case is taken,
setting:
TREE_NO_WARNING (repl) = 1;
If removing this line we will get a warning in "tree-ssa-uninit.c":
test.c:120:14: warning: 'SR.1' is used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
return x[0];
^
Though the generated name is not looking good,
if forcing SRA to make a name it end up with instead:
test.c:120:14: warning: '<anonymous>' is used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
return x[0];
I'm not sure where to take it from here, suggestions?
