https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #7)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 41772 [details]
> > Patch candidate
> >
> > I'm going to prepare some test-cases for that. Does it look good?
>
> Yes, it now inlines small constant sizes. However large and variable sized
> copies have the wrong return value:
>
> void *f1(void *p, void *q) { return __builtin_mempcpy(p, q, 256); }
>
> f1:
> mov x2, 256
> b memcpy
Yep, I've noticed. It's strange for me why it's not working. I've just asked at
GCC ML: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-07/msg00144.html
