https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81395
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #6) > The relevant xsgetn code essentially is an optimization, right? Shouldn't be > too difficult to figure out what would happen in the slow, correct case... > What's wrong with a normal uncommitted case, thus _M_reading = false? > Performance? Correctness? I have **no** idea :-)
