https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65430
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This ought to fix both problems: --- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c +++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c @@ -10443,6 +10443,7 @@ tree c_process_expr_stmt (location_t loc, tree expr) { tree exprv; + tree orig_expr = expr; if (!expr) return NULL_TREE; @@ -10450,7 +10451,7 @@ c_process_expr_stmt (location_t loc, tree expr) expr = c_fully_fold (expr, false, NULL); if (warn_sequence_point) - verify_sequence_points (expr); + verify_sequence_points (orig_expr); if (TREE_TYPE (expr) != error_mark_node && !COMPLETE_OR_VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (expr)) @@ -10462,7 +10463,7 @@ c_process_expr_stmt (location_t loc, tree expr) out which is the result. */ if (!STATEMENT_LIST_STMT_EXPR (cur_stmt_list) && warn_unused_value) - emit_side_effect_warnings (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (expr, loc), expr); + emit_side_effect_warnings (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (orig_expr, loc), orig_expr); exprv = expr; while (TREE_CODE (exprv) == COMPOUND_EXPR)