I'm responding here as it was "opened" in this list directly.
You were right, adding -fno-diagnostics-color doesn't show anything
empty, changing it to -fdiagnostics-color bring the nice colors in - and
the spaces instead of the code (yes, I've copied it directly from the
terminal).

I'm on the following machine:

hostname = mymachine-trisquel
uname -m = x86_64
uname -r = 3.13.0-116-lowlatency
uname -s = Linux
uname -v = #163+7.0trisquel2 SMP PREEMPT Thu Apr 6 13:16:46 UTC 2017

I've just got the latest revision 247521 from branch-gcc-7 and did a
recompile (this time using the GCC 7 that was previously built) and the
issue stays.

I've just placed the output into a vim stdin pipe and can see the source
+ its control attributes:

make 2>&1 | vim - -R -c 'set filetype=nomodified nomodifiable nonu'

^[[01m^[[K../../../cobc/typeck.c:1064:2:^[[m^[[K ^[[01;36m^[[Knote:
^[[m^[[K'^[[01m^[[Ksnprintf^[[m^[[K' output between 17 and 63 bytes into
a destination of size 17
  ^[[01;36m^[[Ksnprintf (buff, (size_t)17,
"%02d/%02d/%02d%02d%c%02d%c%02d",^M^[[m^[[K

^[[01;36m^[[K^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^[[m^[[K
 ^[[01;36m^[[K  current_compile_time.day_of_month,^M^[[m^[[K
   ^[[01;36m^[[K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^[[m^[[K
 ^[[01;36m^[[K  current_compile_time.month,^M^[[m^[[K
   ^[[01;36m^[[K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^[[m^[[K
 ^[[01;36m^[[K  current_compile_time.year % 100,^M^[[m^[[K
   ^[[01;36m^[[K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^[[m^[[K
 ^[[01;36m^[[K  current_compile_time.hour, '.',^M^[[m^[[K
   ^[[01;36m^[[K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^[[m^[[K
 ^[[01;36m^[[K  current_compile_time.minute, '.',^M^[[m^[[K
   ^[[01;36m^[[K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^[[m^[[K
 ^[[01;36m^[[K  current_compile_time.second)^[[m^[[K;^M
   ^[[01;36m^[[K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^[[m^[[K

The main question is: is this a GCC problem or a Trisquel problem?
If it is the later is there any option for GCC to recognize this problem?

Simon

Am 02.05.2017 um 01:29 schrieb Martin Sebor:
> On 05/01/2017 01:39 PM, Simon Sobisch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just got GCC7 (build from svn worked like a charm, even if it
>> took hours but I was warned) and like the new warnings and hints very
>> much.
>>
>> When compiling GnuCOBOL from vcs (sources on mount, therefore the long
>> path) I got one warning with multiple and very long tilde lines.
>>
>> /media/sf_Entwicklung/GnuCOBOL/gnu-cobol-2.0_texi/cobc/typeck.c: In
>> function 'cb_build_registers':
>> /media/sf_Entwicklung/GnuCOBOL/gnu-cobol-2.0_texi/cobc/typeck.c:1064:30:
>> warning: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last format
>> character [-Wformat-truncation=]
>>   snprintf (buff, (size_t)17, "%02d/%02d/%02d%02d%c%02d%c%02d",
>>                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> /media/sf_Entwicklung/GnuCOBOL/gnu-cobol-2.0_texi/cobc/typeck.c:1064:2: note:
>> 'snprintf' output between 17 and 63 bytes into a destination of size 17
>>
>>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>    current_compile_time.second);
>>    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> It looks like the source in the lines between are missing (the number
>> of tildes is correct).
>> The source reads:
>>
>>     snprintf (buff, (size_t)17, "%02d/%02d/%02d%02d%c%02d%c%02d",
>>         current_compile_time.day_of_month,
>>         current_compile_time.month,
>>         current_compile_time.year % 100,
>>         current_compile_time.hour, '.',
>>         current_compile_time.minute, '.',
>>         current_compile_time.second);
> 
> Hmm, that's quite odd.  I'm not able to reproduce this "effect"
> and I have never seen anything like it.  My first thought was
> that it could be a problem with the terminal you are using (try
> compiling with -fno-diagnostics-color to see if it improves)
> but since you presumably copied the error message above from
> the terminal that's probably not going to help.  If it doesn't,
> can you please create a new bug and attach to it a preprocessing
> translation unit (compile the source file with -E and save the
> output)?  Also include the full set of command line options you
> invoked the compiler with when you got the "invisible" message.
> 
> [...}
> 
> Martin

Reply via email to