https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80507
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-04-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I thought the original in-class declaration needed to be constexpr, but
actually that would be invalid if it didn't have an in-class initializer.