https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
--- Comment #54 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #53) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #51) > > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #50) > > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #48) > > > > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #47) > > > > > I'll try some bisection. > > > > > > > > Did you get the full tarball running on an x86_64? > > > > > > Yes, at least up to the point where I could "make check". > > > > > > I would have gone faster if "make -j4" worked to compile > > > the package in parallel :-) > > > > Strange. We always do `make -j4`. What went wrong? > > Well, "make -j4" worked, but the speedup due to parallel > processing was not big, around 29 min of CPU time for > 22 min of wall clock time: > > real 22m21.054s > user 28m7.053s > sys 0m52.747s I see. This is indeed true, but is IMHO the price to pay for OO code with many interdependencies. Up to now we refrained from using submodules.
