https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80304
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|diagnostic |wrong-code
Summary|Warn about variable |[7 Regression] Wrong result
|redefinition in |with do concurrent
|do-concurrent |
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Chinoune from comment #10)
> 1- Why 'b' has been calculated correctly while 'a' hasn't ?! .the only
> difference between the two functions is ( +1. )
The behavior is undefined, this may work, or it may not.
> 2- I attached a new modified test and it fails.
OK... this one is indeed a wrong-code bug. Setting regression
marker and adding wrong-code bug again.
I suspect a middle end problem, let's see if I can also
make this into a C test case.
