https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498
--- Comment #26 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> --- So I had hoped this old BZ would be fixed by the changes for 71437. Sadly, that is not the case. *But* the WIP for for 78496 does happen to fix this BZ. In fact, we only need the hunks from 78496 which are inexpensive. So I may carve those out and push them forward as a fix for this BZ as well as an improvement for 78496.
