https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 41030
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41030&action=edit
first patch candidate

First variant of an aggressive approach - never add IVs / loop carried
dependencies in PRE.  This first approach is leaner on compile-time /
memory-use
in PRE but eventually misses 2nd level optimizations by not performing PHI
insertions on loop headers.

Reply via email to