https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80050
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Fri, 17 Mar 2017, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80050 > > Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I thought the same thing. It looks like a deficiency in the implementation. > The following is a simple test case for the missing warning. I'm undecided > whether to open a separate bug for it or if this bug should track it. Separate bug please. > $ cat u.c && gcc -S -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Wlogical-op u.c > int f (int i) > { > if (i == 123 && i != 456) > return 1; > > return 2; > }
