https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44943
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I believe this request was largely resolved in r163400 by moving the C++
documentation of volatile accesses to the C manual.
The additional sentence (underlined in comment #0) wasn't added but to me the
text just before it implies it. If you'd still like it added please reopen the
bug.
