https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Marc Mutz from comment #5) > Why is this only "missed-optimization"? Don't these architecture's ABIs > stipulate passing in registers, as well as the Itanium ABI? So why is this > not a platform ABI conformance issue? There's no conformance issue because the value is passed in registers. It's just redundantly copied onto the stack first (and then off again).
