https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> --- THe question I'm really trying to answer is whether or not the bug is limited to gcc-4.9.x. If so, then we can just close this as 4.9.x are dead branches. It appears that's the case, but I'm doing a verification step to be sure.
