https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661
--- Comment #22 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #21)
> The testcase seems to be working properly by now, but unfortunately the
> patch breaks dtio_25.f90 (execution test), i.e. the test case from PR 78854.
What fails there is the execution check in line 36, which expects the buffer to
be
&NML x%c="a",x%k= 5 /
but with my patch the buffer becomes
&NML X=x%c="a",x%k= 5 /
Are we actually supposed to write out the variable name ('X=') for types with
DTIO procedures or not?
