https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79727
--- Comment #2 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com --- Wait, it can't do with a substring match? That wasn't clear at all from the documentation, and it makes the default a lot more strict than I assumed. Some of the regexes are rather strange, then; one would assume that the ones starting with [ \t.!]* are to capture word boundaries; why would . and ! be there otherwise? To capture strange comment syntaxes like this? // !else, fallthrough-
