https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79643
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Well, it could have been -m[no-]custom=X,Y,... instead of separate options, but yes, it's hard to improve this as requested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79643
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Well, it could have been -m[no-]custom=X,Y,... instead of separate options, but yes, it's hard to improve this as requested.