https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79403
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The files are symlinks in the build tree, mode 640 in the source tree (like
> everything else) and are installed with "cp -p" which explains the broken
> permissions. Most other things are installed "install -m 644".
Right, there are "chmod a+r" or "chmod 644" all over the place. But we cannot
use 644 because we cannot have write access for the ALI files.
> Perhaps because few people install a system Ada compiler from sources.
Well, I guess not many people use your very unusual setup either... This has
remained unchanged in the Makefile for 25 years! Untested patch:
Index: gcc-interface/Makefile.in
===================================================================
--- gcc-interface/Makefile.in (revision 245271)
+++ gcc-interface/Makefile.in (working copy)
@@ -2687,8 +2687,8 @@ install-gnatlib: ../stamp-gnatlib-$(RTSD
for file in $(RTSDIR)/*.ad[sb]*; do \
$(INSTALL_DATA_DATE) $$file $(DESTDIR)$(ADA_INCLUDE_DIR); \
done
- cd $(DESTDIR)$(ADA_INCLUDE_DIR); $(CHMOD) a-wx *.adb
- cd $(DESTDIR)$(ADA_INCLUDE_DIR); $(CHMOD) a-wx *.ads
+ cd $(DESTDIR)$(ADA_INCLUDE_DIR); $(CHMOD) a-wx+r *.adb
+ cd $(DESTDIR)$(ADA_INCLUDE_DIR); $(CHMOD) a-wx+r *.ads
../stamp-gnatlib2-$(RTSDIR):
$(RM) $(RTSDIR)/s-*.ali
@@ -2800,7 +2800,7 @@ gnatlib: ../stamp-gnatlib1-$(RTSDIR) ../
$(RTSDIR)/memtrack.o
$(RANLIB_FOR_TARGET) $(RTSDIR)/libgmem$(arext)
endif
- $(CHMOD) a-wx $(RTSDIR)/*.ali
+ $(CHMOD) a-wx+r $(RTSDIR)/*.ali
touch ../stamp-gnatlib-$(RTSDIR)
# Warning: this target assumes that LIBRARY_VERSION has been set correctly.
