https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78663
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko <m.ostapenko at samsung dot com> --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #5) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > > Have you raised this with compiler-rt upstream already? > > > > I don't believe that upstream supports the sanitisers for Darwin < 11. > > > > However, as seen, they are quite capable of function with a little TLC. I > > don't have a chance to progress this until at least mid-Feb, if it's more > > urgent, then (a) please adopt some version of the patch locally, or (b) > > disable for Darwin < 11. > > They don't, but they can actually accept the patch for Darwin 10 (I used to > commit such patches after previous merge). > I can post attached fix upstream, but than I'll ask you (or Dominique) for > help in testing if they won't accept the patch as it is (most likely they > won't). I've initiated discussion upstream: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29287
