https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70012
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #4) > > Created attachment 40568 [details] > > Proposed patch > > > > Attaching proposed patch. Iain, would you be able to test this on Darwin > > 32- and 64-bit and see whether it makes sense? > > On darwin (powerpc-darwin9, trunk 244915) the patch flips the fail from m32 > -> m64. I.E. without the patch m64 passes and m32 fails; with the patch, > the inverse. > > I haven't built powerpc64-darwin9 in quite a while, so no comment there. > > Apologies, but will have defer analysis for a while. Hi Iain, If you get a chance to just send me the vectorization dump file from each of -m32 and -m64, I can figure out why the tests fail for powerpc-darwin9 -m64. My guess from what I'm seeing is that powerpc64-darwin9 will have the same characteristics as powerpc-darwin9 -m64. Thanks, Bill
