https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79254
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-01-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's wrong to say it's not exception-safe, because it is, but it only meets the
basic exception-safety guarantee, not the strong one required by
[string.require] p2.
I think I looked at solving this when implementing the new basic_string and
decided I didn't care about POCMA allocators enough to do it.
