https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14494
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P3
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Of the compilers I've tried (Clang, the EDG front end, IBM XLC++, Microsoft
Visual Studio, and Oracle Solaris Studio) only EDG accepts the code, all others
reject it for the same or similar looking reason as GCC. I recall running into
this error myself years ago but I'm also not sure if it's meant to be valid.
Given that it's rejected by most implementations it doesn't seem important
enough to be P2.
