https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78901
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, the C++ FE doesn't care about the nothrow attribute for the builtins, but
about cfns.gperf only. The thing is, the C99 builtins are presumably
conditional on the C++ version, for -std=c++11 and above should be nothrow and
for -std=c++98 shouldn't be. So perhaps we need 2 or 3 separate gperf lists,
one for C89, one for C99 and one for C11 functions? There are just very few
C11 functions, but many C99 ones.
