https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59161
--- Comment #12 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> --- > So I think the libstdc++ part is fixed, Thanks. TBC, given the pointer example in comment #9, I think GDB's implicit use of options.addressprint=off for pretty printers is a clear GDB bug. I think GDB should change here, somehow. > do we want a GDB bug to consider > changing how reference members are displayed? (I think printing the value as > well as the address makes sense). Given we don't auto-deref pointers in structs either, I'm a bit undecided. But filing a bug might be good, to see if others have opinions. I'll take care of it.
