https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Actually I'm not sure what can be done to fix this. In the general case we can't print the correct value, because we may not be able to increment the 'current' member to point to the object that would result from dereferencing the reverse_iterator. The code for ++current might not be present in the executable. Even if we could do that, we'd get inconsistent behaviour depending on the type of current. If it's a container from the C++03 standard library then we'd automatically dereference it (because the iterators from those containers have pretty printers that auto-dereference), if it's a pointer, or a user-defined iterator, or and iterator from a container from the C++11 standard library then we don't have a printer and so won't auto-dereference it. Which is yet another reason not to automatically dereference iterators.
