https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think it's simply wrong to automatically dereference iterators. GDB doesn't do that when printing pointers, so why do the pretty printers do it for iterators? There are loads of cases where it does the wrong thing, not only for past-the-end iterators but also for default-constructed ones that might contain uninitialized pointers.
