https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #15)
> > Interpretation request F08/0001 / 10-145 changes this ("EDITS to 10-007")"
> >
> > '[286:4] In 12.4.3.4.5p3, after "the other has the POINTER attribute",
> > Insert "and not the INTENT(IN) attribute".'
> > Cf. http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/193/10-199.txt
>
> Unfortunately this was forgotten in the above commit. To do!
That is, we need to reject this example, because both interfaces are compatible
with the call (i.e. they are not distinguishable):
INTERFACE gen
SUBROUTINE suba(a)
REAL,ALLOCATABLE :: a(:)
END SUBROUTINE
SUBROUTINE subp(p)
REAL,POINTER,INTENT(IN) :: p(:)
END SUBROUTINE
END INTERFACE
REAL,ALLOCATABLE,TARGET :: x(:)
ALLOCATE(x(100))
CALL gen(x)
end
For the explanation see the link above.
