https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267
--- Comment #43 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #42) > (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #41) > > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #39) > > Otherwise the definition of SANITIZER_OS_TRACE results in > > libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mac.cc making calls to os_trace(). > > And of course that change negates the need for a fix-includes at all. for GCC, in the short-term yes, but as Rainer pointed out earlier - the problem affects other OSS packages when built with GCC (so it would be nice to have the fix). However, if it's not going to be realistically feasible then let's fall back to the simple approach.
