https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78166
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
Summary|[6 Regression] |[6/7 Regression]
|hash.c:1887:1: error: |hash.c:1887:1: error:
|unrecognizable insn |unrecognizable insn
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
ISTM this fails on the trunk as well and thus is a regression for gcc-7 as
well. I think tracking down why we generate the (plus (mult)) variant is
probably wiser than adding the patterns back.
Based on insn 424 being recognized, I would hazard a guess it's something in
the predicate that didn't get changed/fixed during the transition.
