https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750

--- Comment #5 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com ---
It's still there. I'm maintaining these changes to my debug tree:



--- gcc/combine.c (revision 241547)

+++ gcc/combine.c (working copy)

@@ -11371,6 +11371,8 @@ simplify_compare_const (enum rtx_code code, machin

 else

 break;



+ /* fall through. */

+

 case LE:

 /* <= C is equivalent to < (C + 1); we do this for C < 0 */

 if (const_op < 0)

@@ -11400,6 +11402,8 @@ simplify_compare_const (enum rtx_code code, machin

 else

 break;



+ /* fall through. */

+

 case GT:

 /* > C is equivalent to >= (C + 1); we do this for C < 0. */

 if (const_op < 0)

Index: gcc/fold-const.c

===================================================================

--- gcc/fold-const.c (revision 241547)

+++ gcc/fold-const.c (working copy)

@@ -6285,7 +6285,7 @@ extract_muldiv_1 (tree t, tree c, enum tree_code c

 return omit_one_operand (type, integer_zero_node, op0);

 }



- /* ... fall through ... */

+ /* fall through. */



 case TRUNC_DIV_EXPR: case CEIL_DIV_EXPR: case FLOOR_DIV_EXPR:

 case ROUND_DIV_EXPR: case EXACT_DIV_EXPR:





I don't have the authority to check anything in without permission.



Louis



 ---- On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:55:00 -0700 mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote ---- 

 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 

 > 

 > Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: 

 > 

 > What |Removed |Added 

 >
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 > CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 

 > 

 > --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- 

 > What's the status of this PR now? 

 > 

 > -- 

 > You are receiving this mail because: 

 > You reported the bug.

Reply via email to