https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77887
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Complete testcase please. (In reply to Marc Mutz from comment #0) > This specialisation ends up not being instantiated, but I'd expect a warning > from a full specialisation nonetheless. This is the case for *loads* of warnings. GCC doesn't do very much with uninstantiated templates. > Hmm. If I change from specialisation to overloading (ie. to a non-template), > the switch still doesn't trigger. Probably because it's inline.
