https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72842
--- Comment #4 from Barry Revzin <barry.revzin at gmail dot com> --- I'll just email. Instantiating foo<void> creates a function template with a non-type template parameter of type void. That's not an allowed type of a non-type template parameter, so I think it should be ill-formed. This would arise when doing something like "enable_if_t<something>..." for SFINAE purposes, I just wanted a more minimal example. If that's not the case, what allows a void non-type template parameter to be used for parameter packs? On Mon, Aug 8, 2016, 2:25 PM daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72842 > > --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> > --- > Since this is not a newsgroup, let me ask differently: Can you please > elaborate > what you consider as a concrete compiler defect, violating the existing > standard? I fail to see the point. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
