https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71967
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> OMG, I forgot implicit none and the only clause.
module m
protected :: k
private :: k
integer k
end module
use m, only : k
implicit none
print *, k
end
is rejected by gfortran with
pr71967_db_1.f90:8:14:
use m, only : k
1
Error: Symbol 'k' referenced at (1) not found in module 'm'
pr71967_db_1.f90:10:11:
print *, k
1
Error: Symbol 'k' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
> So is ifort wrong in treating protected like an access statement?
No idea, but IMO
protected :: k
public :: k
should be valid.
Note that if ifort is right, I'ld like to see where it is said so in the
standard.
