https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, I think that change was too conservative; it avoids copy elision when we
*might* be initializing a base subobject, but here if ptr were pointing to a
base subobject we'd be calling the wrong constructor anyway, so copy elision
doesn't make it worse.
