https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734

--- Comment #7 from Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan at gmail dot com> ---
H.J.

I've just checked this test with my local fixed compiler and got:
Running /users/ysrumyan/workspaces/71261/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/vect.exp ...
PASS: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++11  scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
PASS: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
PASS: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++14  scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
PASS: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
PASS: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++98  scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
PASS: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)

So it looks like not my fault.

2016-07-18 21:38 GMT+03:00 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734
>
> Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |seurer at linux dot 
> vnet.ibm.com
>
> --- Comment #6 from Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
> Looks like the simd3/4 tests now work with this patch but
> g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc now fails:
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc  -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
>
> In the log I see
>
> /tmp/cc3mxFhd.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/cc3mxFhd.s:29: Error: unrecognized opcode: `xsxexpdp'
> compiler exited with status 1
>
> and also
>
> /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc:7:10: fatal
> error: xmmintrin.h: No such file or directory
> compilation terminated.
> compiler exited with status 1
>
>
> Maybe some of the options you removed weren't really redundant?
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to