https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71851
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- seeding from the current time sounds like a bad idea from a security perspective. why not __RANDOM__ or __SECURE_RANDOM__?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71851
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- seeding from the current time sounds like a bad idea from a security perspective. why not __RANDOM__ or __SECURE_RANDOM__?