https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71753
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Ćukasz Spintzyk from comment #4) > Looking from this point of view is this really invalid? There is a perfectly valid way to write such code: "You need to use an unsigned type for this type of computation."