https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- That said, char b; short f; unsigned e; int g = 20; void foo () { int l, h; for (l = 0; l <= 7; l++) { int j = 38; if (g) h = 0; for (; h <= 7; h++) { int i, k = b % (j % 4); g = f; for (;;) { j = 6 || b; if (e) { for (; j; --j) if (k) __builtin_printf ("%d", 9); if (i) __builtin_printf ("%d", j); } if (l) continue; break; } i = f || b; } } } int main () { foo (); return 0; } (just moving the int h; declaration before the outermost loop) is IMHO already valid, and still SIGFPEs.