https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488 > > Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org, > | |rguenther at suse dot de > > --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1) > > > The problem already exists at RTL expand time. The corresponding insn > > sequence is: > > > > ;; mask__3.59_48 = vect_cst__51 == { 0, 0 }; > > Richi, shouldn't this be a VEC_COND_EXPR ? I think we're supposed to handle this fine now. Ilja should know this better though.
