https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71402
--- Comment #12 from andysem at mail dot ru --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #11) > 5.3 has the bug I mentioned above. It makes the pragmas believe that, for > this warning, the location is at the end of the file, which is after the > pop. Perhaps you can trick gcc by placing another pragma ignored at the end > of the file. But that will silence all warnings that suffer from this bug. So that would effectively be equivalent to adding -Wno-unused-variable to the command line, right? Only more obscure.
