https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |easyhack
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2016-05-26
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|INVALID |---
Summary|-Wterminate is not |Inconsistent location for
|described in "Options to |C++ warning options in the
|Request or Suppress |manual
|Warnings" |
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> There are other C++-only options under "Options to Request or Suppress
> Warnings".
> For example:
> * -Wc++11-compat
> * -Wc++14-compat
> * -Wconditionally-supported
> * -Wno-conversion-null
> * -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant
> * -Wsubobject-linkage
> * -Wdelete-incomplete
> * -Wuseless-cast
> * -Wsized-deallocation
> * -Wno-invalid-offsetof
>
> It's kind of inconsistent whether C++-only warnings are listed here or there.
The perfect solution would be to move the options documentation to the *.opt
files where they are defined and auto-generate the corresponding parts of the
*.texi files from the *.opt files. This way the documentation would be much
more consistent. This is similar to what we already do for target-hooks: see
gcc/target.def
That would be a very nice little project for a newbie.
The short-term solution is for someone to propose patches to move those to the
correct place:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted#Basics:_Contributing_to_GCC_in_10_easy_steps
