https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 17 May 2016, ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 > > --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So > do all of r236090 related failures are reproducible with glibc 2.11.3 > only? I only tried 2.11.3 and 2.18 (no intermediate versions), yes. > IIUC the problem most probably hides in sanitizer runtime libraries and you > can't make preprocessed testcase reproducible with other Glibc, right? Well, the fact that libgo has a lot of execute fails doesn't point to libsanitizer. Maybe to split-stack support, who knows. What is special about r236090 that would change behavior of glibc?
