https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #31 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:48:17PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:55:01PM +0000, fritzoreese at gmail dot com wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226 > > > > --- Comment #29 from Fritz Reese <fritzoreese at gmail dot com> --- > > (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #25) > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O0 execution test > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O1 execution test > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O2 execution test > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer > > > -funroll-loops > > > -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O3 -g execution test > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -Os execution test > > > > It was silly of me to disregard endian-ness in this test case. Fixed: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-05/msg00018.html > > > > Thanks for the patch. I'll take care of this on Saturday, > if no one else commits before then. > Patch has been committed.
