https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70848
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> With an old cross to arm I can indeed see (.018t.ssa):
>
> void test() ()
> {
> volatile int * _1;
> volatile int * _4;
> volatile int * _6;
>
> <bb 2>:
> _1 = 327221280B;
> *_1 = 97;
> _4 = 327221280B;
> *_4 = 98;
> _6 = 327221280B;
> *_6 = 99;
> return;
>
>
> note the missing {v} at the assignments.
I wonder why this doesn't happen on x86 or aarch64...
Is there some target hook called that erroneously strips the 'volatility' from
the type somewhere?
