https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630

--- Comment #11 from Vittorio Zecca <zeccav at gmail dot com> ---
I am still having an ICE with gfortran 5.3.0 on the following

      module abc
      implicit none
      type,abstract::abc_abstract
      contains
      procedure(abc_interface),deferred::abc_function
      end type abc_abstract
      type,extends(abc_abstract)::abc_type
      contains
      procedure::abc_function
      end type abc_type
      abstract interface
      function abc_interface(this)
       import abc_abstract
       class(abc_abstract),intent(in)::this
       character(len=*)::abc_interface
      end function abc_interface
      end interface
      contains
      function abc_function(this)
      class(abc_type),intent(in)::this
      character(len=5)::abc_function
      abc_function="hello"
      end function abc_function
      subroutine do_something(this)
      class(abc_abstract),intent(in)::this
      print *,this%abc_function()
      end subroutine do_something
      end module abc

gfbug111.f:30:0:

       print *,this%abc_function()
 1
internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1465
0xc3eae3 wide_int_to_tree(tree_node*,
generic_wide_int<wide_int_ref_storage<false> > const&)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/tree.c:1465
0xc3ebb9 build_int_cst(tree_node*, long)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/tree.c:1273
0x83a9aa round_up_loc(unsigned int, tree_node*, unsigned int)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fold-const.c:16043
0xa555bb finalize_type_size
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/stor-layout.c:1802
0xa56766 layout_type(tree_node*)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/stor-layout.c:2442
0xc3cb73 build_array_type_1
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/tree.c:7968
0x709a64 gfc_get_character_type_len_for_eltype(tree_node*, tree_node*)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c:1048
0x6d16d7 gfc_conv_procedure_call(gfc_se*, gfc_symbol*,
gfc_actual_arglist*, gfc_expr*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>*)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:5644
0x6d1d6f gfc_conv_function_expr
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:6293
0x6d789a gfc_conv_expr_reference(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:7349
0x6f277f gfc_trans_transfer(gfc_code*)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:2394
0x6a4e47 trans_code
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans.c:1868
0x6f03a7 build_dt
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:1921
0x6a4e67 trans_code
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans.c:1840
0x6c4ce3 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:5851
0x6a8421 gfc_generate_module_code(gfc_namespace*)
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/trans.c:2036
0x662d4d translate_all_program_units
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5330
0x662d4d gfc_parse_file()
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5540
0x6a22b5 gfc_be_parse_file
        /home/vitti/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:229
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

Maybe it is related to this issue?

Reply via email to